Naturists Campaigning for Naturism

A recent Court victory, and the lessons learned (Sept. 2017)

A recent case involving nudity in a public place (2017).
Here is a brief synopsis of the case. It is hoped that we can all learn something from it. It is published with the consent of the accused, though anonymised to avoid further unnecessary suffering.
X has been a naturist for over 20 years, and has often driven his car naked during the last 17. He was travelling alone in his car on his way to collect his wife from work, and was driving naked, when he was stopped by traffic lights near a city centre. Y and his wife pulled up in a higher vehicle alongside and glanced across, and saw that X was naked. The Ys were ‘outraged’. X saw Y looking at him, and quickly pulled a pair of shorts across his lap. The lights then changed and X drove off. However, Y followed him and dialled 999 and asked the police to apprehend X, which they did by Y following for some miles and guiding the police to where he was driving using their mobile phone. X was arrested, taken to the police station and told he would be charged with Public Nuisance. Subsequently this charge was changed to a breach of Section 66 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, which outlaws ‘exposure’ (‘the flashers law’).
In his witness statement Y alleged that X had been masturbating and grinning at him. X denied this and said that if his hands were moving at all it would have been his normal driving habit of checking that his gearstick was in neutral prior to releasing the clutch, having applied the hand brake. Y’s view was partially obscured as X’s car had sun screens stuck on the inside of the windows. The case hinged on the wording of S66, which states:
A person commits an offence if—
(a)he intentionally exposes his genitals, and
(b)he intends that someone will see them and be caused alarm or distress….”

The onus was on the prosecution to demonstrate that X intended to be seen and to cause alarm or distress.

X argued that he was a naturist, and enjoyed the feeling of being naked for its own sake, and he had no wish to be seen by others. This was demonstrated by the fact that in normal driving conditions he would only be seen from the waist up, and with the sun screens on the windows the likelihood of being seen at all was much reduced. In addition, having something handy to cover-up with if seen, helped convince the Court that there was no intention of causing alarm or distress to anyone. All-in-all X had demonstrated a pattern of behaviour which was not that of a ‘flasher’. The Magistrates therefore found him Not Guilty, and did not even comment on his being naked or the allegation of masturbation. This is an encouraging and legally correct interpretation which is all too uncommon in the Courts. X was represented by good lawyers ( ), experience in this sort of case, and supported by NAG and BN who worked closely together on this case.

So, what can we learn from this? As a Magistrate’s Court case it does not have the power to set a legal precedent, but the Police and Crown Prosecution Service will probably learn from it. Any learning is likely to be fairly local though, as at the level of Magistrates Courts, and Local Police Authorities there is not much national cross-over. We can still hope it might help police and CPS be a little less ‘gung-ho’ in bringing cases mostly because someone is naked.

Or… it might just make them a bit more thoughtful and crafty in bringing cases! It is worth emphasising that a critical element of the victory lay in the police & CPS’s ineptitude. They chose to prosecute under S66, Sexual Offences Act 2003, with pretty poor evidence. As we saw, S66 required the prosecution to demonstrate that X had ‘intent’ to be seen and cause alarm or distress. This they failed to do because X was able to show the Court evidence that he did not intend either to be seen or to cause alarm or distress. I suspect the CPS took the approach they did because of the allegation of masturbation, allied to nudity. In fact, even if the allegation had been true, it would have been legally irrelevant under S66 if there had been no intent to be seen and cause alarm & distress. However, if the CPS had chosen to prosecute under S5 of the Public Order Act 1986, the case could have easily gone the other way, even with the same evidence. This is because S5 POA does not require ‘intent’. It merely requires that the behaviour is ‘likely’ to be seen and cause alarm etc. In such cases a major consideration is trying to decide how likely is ‘likely’. There is very little legal guidance on this and in practice it is up to the magistrates to decide it for themselves on whatever criteria pops into their heads at the time, and this can lead to unpredictable decisions, which reflect magistrates’ personal opinions as much as Law or evidence. So no one should consider themselves immune from prosecution, or conviction; and though NAG supports the belief that simple nudity in public places is not illegal, in practice it is always as well to remember that it is unusual and often misunderstood, misinterpreted, and can sometimes lead to trouble. So common sense and consideration should be the watchwords.

It is clear that there remains a lot to be done in educating the police and CPS in order to forestall such incidents. Though X was found Not Guilty, he and his wife have had a very stressful time for many months during this process. Their legal cost are over £2,000, and there is no guarantee they will get it all back, even with the Not Guilty verdict. Exactly what it cost the taxpayer to bring this incorrect and pointless prosecution is anyone’s guess, but it will be many thousands of pounds which could have gone on fighting real crime. The answer lies in education of the police at all levels, but especially the front-line first responders. This is not easy, and the tighter public budgets become the less easy training and education becomes, even though the potential savings in wasted prosecutions could be greater. However, we must keep on chipping away at the problem – and NAG is determined to do so, both alone and in concert with other organisations such as BN, which have similar aims – Naturist Freedom.

Duncan Heenan

6 Responses to A recent Court victory, and the lessons learned (Sept. 2017)

  • I’m so to hear the outcome of this case, although this should never have been in court in the first place. Surely the car is a personal space in the same way as a house and the person is entitled to dress (or otherwise) how they like within that space especially as he tried to cover up. The supposed offended people did make the effort to look into his car, it’s not like he jumped out in front of them.

  • I am very pleased with the outcome of this case. I spend a lot of time driving naked with no intent to cause alarm or distress to anyone. I just feel very comfortable driving naked. In the many years of driving this way only one other motorist spotted me and he just laughed. That was in a traffic jam on the M6. I now always cover up in traffic jams.

  • Thank you for passing on your synopsis of this case. Whilst I applaud the outcome of this, doesn’t it go to highlight of the weaknesses in our legal system. The authorities are just paying lip service to naturism. As long as airy fairy loosely worded sections are allowed to remain available to the courts (S5 of the Public Order Act 1986) then nudity in any public place might just as well be illegal. As I remember it, these badly worded additions, were rushed in to allegedly help stamp out football hoolaganism which was rife in the eighties. I seem to remember reading somewhere, that when approached about the possible restrictions to naturists, the Home Secretary announced that: These new laws were not intended to, nor would they be used to disfavour naturists following their chosen way of life. The case you reported on is encouraging in that it shows that at least some people in authority are capable of applying the rules as they are appropriate and written.

  • Yes indeed, a “correct” outcome. Sadly though the outcome being the lowest court almost meaningless. Personally I have considerable doubt that either the police or CPS will learn from this. In my experience they have to pushed a lot harder before they are able to learn.

    It happens that I too have been arrested for being in a car naked, and for alleged breach of POA s5. Now this was a good few years ago, well before the CPS had published their guidelines on public nudity.

    So what actually happened. I was parked up in a lay-by just before midnight alone, on the way home from a naked drive. One other hgv parked up some 100 yards away. Some will of course question why I was parked up in a lay-by at midnight. In answer I say that sometime I choose to be naked, I enjoy the freedom, it might be in public it might not. However, I do not have a different set of behavioural rules for when being naked. I am without clothes but in every other sense behave the same.

    A marked police car containing three female officers, one a trained and all very inexperienced, passed on a “routine” patrol. Having passed slowly the car stopped, backed up and shone a very bright light into my car illuminating me. At the same time one of the officers had got out and pressed her face up against the window confirming to the others “Yes, he’s naked”.

    I was promptly arrested, and asked to get out of my car. Of course I complied, still naked. The officers now had a significant problem. They did not know what to do, because and only because I was naked AND not intimidated. It was as if they were unable to comprehend the prospect of taking a naked man to the police station. They scratched about in their car, found an old cardboard box and asked me to “wear” it. Naturally I declined. I have no fear or shame about my [legal] nakedness but I might well have been acutely embarressed waiting at the station wearing a cardboard box.

    Time was passing, I was still naked, now in the open, visible in the lights of the occasional passing cars. In order to break the deadlock I walked to the rear of my car and found a very old pair of shorts used as a rag and kept with a few tools. That did the job and we were off to the station.

    All this commotion had awaked the sleeping trucker who witness most of the affair.

    Anyway, I was held for 4 1/2 hours, interviewed quite intensively and eventually released without caution, charge or warning. The arresting officer then took me back to my car. What did I do? I took my shorts off and got back into my car.

    There are a couple of interesting points about this story.

    First and most importantly for naturist naked (anywhere) know your rights and don’t be offset when others try to say your are wrong.

    Second, be polite, be as co-operative as possible, be confident, keep your head up maintain eye contact. You are setting the scene for your impending interview.

    There is an irony here in that I was invisible to members off the public until the officers became involved, illuminated me for all to see and required me to stand naked in a public place where I was visible to passing cars.

  • this is not how the law works in the US criminal justice system! in the US if you are accused of a crime and you do not have an ‘expensive’ attorney you will be convicted in many cases regardless of the circumstances and regardless of the crime! justice in the is ‘bought’ by those with the money as you may see from watching various news stories about the US criminal justice system! there are many stories of people being falsely arrested or shot in the US by the police and some of the stories have gone viral on social media and have evoked many protests and calls for change! this case is an example of how a justice system is ‘supposed’ to work and the US system is very corrupt and dysfunctional!

  • i can tell from reading the comments in the UK the police have a much better sense of humor and much better sense in general! the justice system in the UK and Germany, France, Australia and most other countries besides the US seems to make alot more sense also!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 × two =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Please Help Us to Campaign for You!

To make a donation to NAG, please use the Donate link at the top of this page. Alternatively, we will appreciate any donation no matter how small sent to our registered address on our Contact page.