Naturists Campaigning for Naturism

I, Chairman…

Unbelievably, 1st April 2013 saw the second anniversary of our founding as an organisation and thought it was about time that I, as chairman, explained what is passing over my desk and map out a possible future path. When my colleagues and I embarked on this mad journey to gain greater acceptance of naturism in British public life, we knew it would be a long, hard road and the support of others was of great importance. During NAG’s short life we have grown to more than 200 supporters and we are continuing to grow. Of course, this is nothing to the membership of British Naturism, believed to be about 10,000, but they do have a 58-year start on us, so give us time.

Perhaps the hardest thing I’ve had to do over the past two years is to convince some in BN that their perception of NAG as a threat to its existence was erroneous, and believe that as an organisation, we still have some work to do there. As a first step, last Autumn I was able to tell BN’s membership directly what the Naturist Action Group was, and perhaps more importantly, wasn’t with the clarity that had not been achieved before and the passing of this information to you is overdue. Anyway, I am sure the relationship between NAG and BN will improve, as we both want to arrive at the same destination, even if the paths we take diverge from time-to-time.

The Naturist Action Group has been

6 Responses to I, Chairman…

  • Whilst it is good news that membership of NAG has risen to 200 it is, as you suggest, quite tiny compared to the membership of British Naturism. If NAG is to be a voice to be listened to then clearly it needs significantly more members.

    Being the ‘Naturist’ Action Group one would assume that its immediate membership appeal would be to naturists but something that’s been going through my mind lately is that there’s a lot of people out there who are not naturists but are sympathetic to the idea that nudity is not something that people should get worked up about. Witness, for example, the huge amount of support that Steve Gough has had through the comments sections of various online media. Look at any online article which involves someone being harassed about nudity and you’ll find a lot of people who say words to the effect of “it’s not for me but, hey, what’s the big deal?” These, in my view, are the people NAG should be looking to recruit. These are people who would never join BN but they might be persuaded to join a civil liberties pressure group which reflects their own views about non-sexual nudity even if they’re not naturist themselves. If this could be achieved it would also differentiate NAG from BN but, at the same time, enable BN and NAG to be seen as complementary organisations.

    Of course the title of NAG may be a bit of a barrier to recruiting non-naturists!

    As to the tricky question of funding I would suggest that a small direct fee to members might be worth reconsidering just so that 1) they feel genuinely part of something and 2) that NAG can be much more confident that it actually represents the views of its members where those members are willing to pay. I wonder how many of NAG’s 200 members are people who have just signed up out of curiosity, read a few posts and never bothered to come back. I’m not sure you have to offer much in return other than the knowledge that they are supporting a worthwhile cause although perhaps a regular newsletter might in order.

    Also, if NAG positions itself as a civil liberties organisation (rather than a naturist organisation) which focuses on a specific area of civil liberties related to the acceptance of public nudity, then I guess it’s possible that grant funding may be available from some of the big civil liberties groups as well as naturist organisations such as BN or maybe some of the more forward thinking naturist clubs.

    Notwithstanding any of the above, could I also perhaps suggest that there is a greater clarity around what NAG is, what it does and what it represents. The home page of the NAG web site starts with the words “In 2010, in an article about Steve Gough…”. It’s now 2013! As a prospective member I think I’d be more interested in the present and the future rather than the past. What I think might be useful is for the home page would be a clear set of one-liner statements about NAG rather than a wordy article which appears to be a few years old (even though I know it’s not!).

    Good luck.

  • I can agree with much of Richard’s comment, but I feel he is misunderstanding NAG by drawing too many comparisons or paralels with BN. Nag is what it is, and doesn’t seek to emulate anyone or anything else. Nag is not a membership organisation, deliberately. When we conceived NAG we didn’t want all the hassle and inward lookingness of a ‘club’. We wanted to be a voice to the world for those who thought as we did, and a focus for people who agreed or wanted to help. We welcome all ‘supporters’, but especially those who are prepared to actually take on some campaigning work. We have limited resources and rather than dissipate our time and money on maintaining an infrastructure, we have a minimalist infrastucture. This means we are a loose alliance, in which individuals can do as much or as little as they wish, and are allowed within reason to adopt their own style. Not everyone can handle this, but we have decided against the alternative approach, which doesn’t seem to get much better results elsewhere.
    Yes, we are a civil liberties organisation, but we were born out of naturism, and we are not ashamed of that – quite the opposite – and don’t want to compromise on that. It is a sad fact that many civil liberties groups contain individuals who feel there is something wrong in nudity, despite their generally liberal credentials.
    NAG welcomes comment and suggestions though, and change is possible. What we don’t want to do is to spend all our time talking about changing NAG to the exclusion of changing the world’s view of nudity.

  • My comparisons/parallels with BN were merely comment on the comparisons/parallels articulated in Reg’s post: membership numbers and the NAG/BN relationship.

    I take you point about not wanting to be a membership organisation although clearly Reg feels that the number of supporters is important enough to be mentioned in the first paragraph of his article. And rightly so: the validity of any pressure group’s arguments is bound to be measured, to a large extent, by number of people supporting its arguments. Whether you call them members or supporters may be just a matter of semantics.

    I know that NAG welcomes any genuine supporters whatever their background, but to consider its *target* supporters to be the naturist community is, in my view, rather limiting and almost self-defeating. An argument in favour of, say, the right to be naked in a public place would carry more weight if it is backed by a hefty number of non-naturists: people who support the rights of others without a vested interest. How far would gay rights organisations have got if their only supporters were homosexuals?

    It’s interesting that you say that “It is a sad fact that many civil liberties groups contain individuals who feel there is something wrong in nudity, despite their generally liberal credentials.” I’m sure you’re right but that shouldn’t be a barrier to engaging with them and harnessing their support. Equally it could be argued that there are many naturists who feel the same way which may go some way to explaining why at least 98% of BN members haven’t yet shown their support for NAG. How much more effective would, say, NAG’s dialogue with the Association of Chief Police Officers etc be if it could demonstrate support from an organisation such as Liberty rather than a handful of naturists?

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m not dissing NAG. I realise it’s still early days; I certainly commend all of you for taking on such a daunting task; and I understand the issues about lack of active support etc. As you say, it is what it is, but that’s no reason for it to always stay as it is – I’m just throwing in an idea or two which might be worth thinking about as NAG evolves.

  • Thanks again Richard.
    You may well be right. The only way to find out is to try it, but as all our voluteers are currently fully engaged in campaigning issues we have no resources available.
    If you are offering to implement you ideas yourself, we’d be very happy to hear your proposals, but they need to be something you are prepared to implement yourself rather than setting up an agenda for others.

  • Reg said in his excellent post “I would welcome your comments on what has already been suggested, or your own suggestions about the best way forward on that, or anything else mentioned above” – which is what prompted me to make a few comments and throw in a few ideas.

    But I sense a slight barb in your response to the effect that supporters are only to be encouraged to make suggestions if they’re prepared to personally put them into action – a tactic which, whilst fully understandable from a hard-pressed band of dedicated volunteers, is more likely to deter people from making suggestions.

    I know from bitter experience that once one dips a toe into the shallows of volunteering, it’s not long before you’re wading in up to your armpits and gasping for air – which is precisely why I currently find myself fully committed to other things for the foreseeable future:(

  • No barb intended. All suggestions are welcome, and help is even more welcome, but more scarce!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

15 − two =

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Please Help Us to Campaign for You!

To make a donation to NAG, please use the Donate link at the top of this page. Alternatively, we will appreciate any donation no matter how small sent to our registered address on our Contact page.